앙리 푸앵카레: 두 판 사이의 차이
내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
잔글편집 요약 없음 |
|||
6번째 줄:
==출처 있음==
=== 과학과 가설 (1905) ===
:<small>{{llang|fr|}}''La Science et l'hypothèse'' (1905)</small>
* 사람이 사실을 토대로 과학을 만드는 것은 마치 돌을 이용해 집을 짓는 과정과도 같다. 돌을 쌓아올렸다고 다 집인 것은 아니듯 사실을 모아놓았다고 과학인 것은 아니다.
=== ''Science and Method'' (1908) ===
:<small>{{llang|fr|}}''Science et méthode'' (1908)</small>
줄 13 ⟶ 18:
** {{llang|en|}}'''The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.''' If nature were not beautiful it would not be worth knowing, and life would not be worth living. I am not speaking, of course, of the beauty which strikes the senses, of the beauty of qualities and appearances. I am far from despising this, but it has nothing to do with science. What I mean is that more intimate beauty which comes from the harmonious order of its parts, and which a pure intelligence can grasp.
*** ''Part I. Ch. 1 : The Selection of Facts, p. 22''
{{기본정렬:푸앵카레, 앙리}}
| |||