사용자:Altostratus/인용 요건: 두 판 사이의 차이

내용 삭제됨 내용 추가됨
Altostratus (토론 | 기여)
편집 요약 없음
Altostratus (토론 | 기여)
51번째 줄:
Plot revelations and other story-related statements are typically not quoteworthy for the general Wikiquote audience unless the words themselves mean something outside of the immediate context. Dialogue sections often stem from this: remember, we collect words that stand on their own, not just important plot points from stories. One exception to this is if some particular interchange in a film became exherently famous; thus, while it may not be quotable in the traditional sense, it is still significant (and therefore quotable, as it has been ''oft'' quoted). Such dialogue can come from frequent media usage, references in other sources, or even from a piece of material that is often parodied. An example of this is Kirk's exclamation ''"Khhhhaaaaaaaan!!!"'' from ''[[Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan|Star Trek:The Wrath of Khan]]''. While not quotable by any traditional standards, the exclamation has entered the pop-culture lexicon as a frequently alluded to and oft-parodied "quote."
 
=== 등재 기준은 한 사람에 대한 문서에 필요하지만 충분하지는 않습니다. ===
===Notability is ''necessary'', but not ''sufficient'', for an article on a person===
The fact that a person meets the notability requirements for inclusion of an article on that person in Wikipedia does not mean that this person is quotable. A person may in fact be highly notable for reasons unrelated to authorship of quotes, and yet never say a single thing worth quoting. An individual's notability will be weighed more heavily if they are notable as a ''source of quotes''. For example, a famous poet or pundit is more likely to be quotable than a famous baseball player - unless that baseball player is someone like [[Yogi Berra]], known for memorable comments.